Tag: corrections

Corrections in America: Learning from those who wrote the book

Corrections in America: Learning from those who wrote the book

Rarely do students have an opportunity to learn from the textbook writers, but that’s the case at the University of CorrectionsinAmericaLouisville (UofL). Dr. Harry E. Allen and Bruce Ponder, faculty members teaching at UofL, along with colleague Dr. Edward J. Latessa at the University of Cincinnati, are now working on the 14th edition of the text for Corrections in America.

In the always-evolving field of corrections, it’s noteworthy that one thing has stayed the same since the 1970s – the textbook. In fact, Corrections in America is the longest continually published textbook in the field and continues to be the best-selling text in the study of corrections.

The 14th edition continues its established tradition of comprehensive, student-friendly instruction coverage with extensive supplemental study materials. It covers virtually all aspects of corrections, including the history of corrections system, prisons in the present, correctional ideologies, sentencing and legal issues, alternatives to imprisonment, institutional corrections, and correctional clients.

But it’s more than just the variety of subject matter that sets Corrections in America apart. The text has maintained its position in the market because of its adaptability. Like the field of corrections itself, the text has undergone numerous changes over the years, with some editions seeing more revisions than all of the previous editions combined, according to the authors.

The authors also take great pride in reviewing feedback from colleagues across the country and work to balance research and theory with practical and predictive examples included in the text. This helps to make the book both informative and interesting to eager to learn students.

The text is organized in sections ranging from historical perspectives and the justice process to correctional systems and functions and a link to the future, in which the authors offer a look at future trends, innovations and programs that could develop and be expanded. By looking forward, the authors challenge students to become thought leaders in their chosen field and think about the sustainability of the corrections environment.

The University of Louisville is a research-based public institution for higher learning widely recognized for its contribution to exploration and innovation in various fields, and Allen and Ponder are a great example of dedication and participation to the progress of the correction field. In addition to their research, the duo will also teach their course online this coming spring, presenting an opportunity for students, both near and far, to gain valuable knowledge and skills in this area of interest.

Naturally, “Corrections in America” 14th edition is the textbook supporting the course JA 202 (Corrections in the U.S.) in the Justice Administration degree program at UofL. The online delivery method allows for students to learn at a time that’s convenient for their schedule and in the comfort of their own home.
The course JA 202 presents an introduction to the history, practices, and issues related to the correctional function in American criminal justice. As with the textbook, topics in the course range from the history of prisons to inmate subcultures and institutions to correctional issues such as overcrowding, stress, sexual violence, and administrative problems. Allen and Ponder note that both adult and juvenile corrections are covered in the course, just like the text.

Learn more about the Corrections in America by visiting http://louisville.edu/justice/about-us/faculty-research. To apply and enroll to the criminal justice degrees at bachelor’s and master’s levels offered online at the University of Louisville, please visit Louisville.edu/online.

Data tools credited for reducing pretrial crime

Data tools credited for reducing pretrial crime

There is much debate on the topic of pretrial bail and on which defendants should be detained and which handcuffsdefendants should be released safely prior to trial. According to the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), a suspect’s release pending trial is almost exclusively based on the charge and whether the suspect has enough money to bail himself or herself out of jail. The release decision is often not based on an informed assessment of whether he or she is a danger to society and/or is likely to return to court for trial.

“Research has shown that under our current system, half of the most dangerous or likely to flee arrestees/defendants are able to make a monetary bail amount and leave jail unsupervised,” claims IACP.

The IACP pretrial justice reform initiative was established in partnership with the Public Welfare Foundation and the Pretrial Justice Institute, with a goal of educating criminal justice leaders on how their local system can save and maximize their limited resources through pretrial reform.

“Reform” is also the buzzword around the implementation of the Public Safety Assessment – Court (PSA-Court) tool in Kentucky. This summer, the Laura and John Arnold Foundation released results from the first six months of PSA-Court. According to their website, IACP is “very pleased and supportive” of the Arnold Foundation’s findings.

Among other things, the PSA-Court report claimed that crime by defendants on pretrial release declined by 15% and the overall number of defendants on pretrial release increased by 70%.

At University of Louisville, the Department of Justice Administration closely follows the trends in public safety, including corrections policies and reforms implementation. Students in the justice administration degree programs (master’s and Ph.D. levels) often use their knowledge acquired in the classroom to create analytical models for scanning the corrections environment, assessing the contemporary issues and proposing solutions to local and state government officials.

“In our master’s program in justice administration, students work closely with local criminal justice agencies and assist these organizations in analyses that result in more effective and efficient operations. Also, as part of a required coursework, our students in the Ph.D. program collaborate closely with criminal justice agencies to develop and assess the implementation of various strategies such as victim/witness programs and day reporting centers” said Dr. Deborah Keeling, Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs, Justice Department at the University of Louisville.

PSA-Court also uses a data driven risk assessment tool, developed by the Arnold Foundation, to help inform judicial decisions about which defendants should be detained and which defendants can most safely be released prior to trial. The report says that, “defendants flagged by the PSA-Court as being at an increased risk of violence are rearrested for violent acts at a rate of 17 times higher than that of defendants who are not flagged.

The full report from the Arnold Foundation on the Public Safety Assessment in Kentucky is available for viewing online.

The Laura and John Arnold Foundation (LJAF) is a private foundation with offices in Houston and New York City. The Foundation is currently focused on the three primary issue areas: Criminal Justice Reform, K-12 Public Education, and Public Accountability. The Foundation’s “core objective is to produce substantial, widespread and lasting national and community reforms that will maximize opportunities and minimize injustice in our society.”

If you’re interested in developing superior expertise in the field of criminal justice, join our elite education program at the bachelor’s, master’s or Ph.D. levels. To apply and enroll to the criminal justice degrees offered online at the University of Louisville, please visit our program page on Louisville.edu/online.